Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G31's score of 77. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 is older and a little heavier than the Motorola Moto G31, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing unit than Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a display that's very similar to the screen in Motorola Moto G31, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a quite lower pixel number per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. The Moto G31 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G31 counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4300mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.