Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Moto G31's 77 general score. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and heavier than the Moto G31, it's design is still just a bit thinner. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Moto G31 has Android 11, offering some extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G31, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit larger display and a just a little higher pixel amount in each inch of screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Moto G31, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way higher video resolution.
Motorola Moto G31 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.