Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Moto G31, having a overall score of 81.2 against 77. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G31, even though it was released 8 years before. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while Moto G31 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a bit sharper display than Moto G31, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, a little bit less pixels per display inch and a quite smaller display.
Moto G31 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Moto G31 also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a larger camera aperture for better low light images. Motorola Moto G31 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G31 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Moto G31 has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.