Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-06 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the Moto G31, having an 86.3 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Moto G31, although it was released 3 years before. Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better performance than Moto G31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels per inch of display. Moto G31 captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G31 also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Moto G31 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.