Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Moto G31, having a 94.8 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S20 construction is a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G31, although it was released about 21 months before. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Moto G31 has Android 11.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit better display than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better display pixel density. The Galaxy S20 has a bit better processing power than Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 features just a bit better camera than Moto G31, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Moto G31 has better battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.