Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Moto G31, getting a score of 95.4 against 77. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Moto G31. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G31 has Android 11.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Moto G31, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a just a bit greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Moto G31 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Moto G31, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as Motorola Moto G31's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.