Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-06 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a bit better than Moto G31, with an 81.9 score against 77. Despite being the best device we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's construction is notably older, heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto G31. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy S8 Active has a bit superior CPU than Moto G31. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Moto G31 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G31 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G31 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G31 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP. The Motorola Moto G31 has superior battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.