Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 411 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Moto G31's score of 77. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is older, a lot heavier and noticeably thicker than the Moto G31. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G31 has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G31. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto G31, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Moto G31 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G31 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Moto G31 counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G31 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G31 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.