Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than the Moto G31's 77 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Moto G31 has Android 11, so it provides you lots of additional features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older and a bit heavier than the Moto G31, it's design is still thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit faster CPU than Moto G31, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G31, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The Moto G31 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a same size aperture, the Moto G31 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Moto G31 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.