Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than the Moto G31's score of 77. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is thinner than the Moto G31, although it's just a little heavier and was released just a bit more than a year before. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better looking display than Moto G31, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Moto G31 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G31 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G31 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.