Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than Moto G31's 77 global score. Both devices we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide the user the same operating system features. Despite of the fact Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and notably heavier than the Moto G31, it's body is still extremely thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The Moto G31 and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature really similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G31, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Moto G31 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's camera is just as good as the camera in Moto G31, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.