Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Moto G31, with a 90.6 score against 77. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Moto G31 were released only 4 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner than the Moto G31.
The Moto G31 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto G31 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light environments and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The Moto G31 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.