Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-12-06 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Baby Blue and Mineral Grey | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Moto G31's overall score of 77. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version and Moto G31 has Android 11. Even being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it's also older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Moto G31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G31 has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Moto G31 also counts with a little higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G31, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Motorola Moto G31 has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G31 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in Motorola Moto G31, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.