Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-05-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than Moto G4 Plus, having a general score of 88.1 against 72.1. IPhone X is a newer and notably thinner cellphone than Moto G4 Plus, but it's also somewhat heavier. Apple iPhone X counts with a better performing CPU than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone X has a better looking display than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The iPhone X features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G4 Plus counts with just a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. IPhone X counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a much less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G4 Plus. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Moto G4 Plus, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.