Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-05-18 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is much better than the Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 general score. Although Apple iPhone XR is incredibly heavier than Moto G4 Plus, it's thinner and extremely newer. IPhone XR features a faster processor than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XR features a little more vivid screen than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little bit worse 828 x 1792 resolution and a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The iPhone XR captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a much less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a larger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The Moto G4 Plus features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G4 Plus also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB. The Moto G4 Plus and the iPhone XR both have extremely similar batteries, although the iPhone XR has 2942mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone XR, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto G4 Plus, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.