Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-05-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is better than Moto G4 Plus, with an 84.2 score against 72.1. Even though the iPhone XS is somewhat heavier than the Moto G4 Plus, it's extremely thinner and noticeably newer. The Apple iPhone XS has a better performing processing unit than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone XS has a better screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bit larger display, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. IPhone XS has a better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto G4 Plus counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G4 Plus also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Moto G4 Plus features just a bit better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G4 Plus. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.