Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Moto G4 Plus, with an 82.9 score against 72.1. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a notably newer and thinner phone than Moto G4 Plus, although it's also heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a little bit bigger display and a better pixels count per inch in the display. The Moto G4 Plus counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G4 Plus also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations. Google Pixel 4 XL features better battery life than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G4 Plus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G4 Plus, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.