Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2016-05-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Moto G4 Plus, with an 81.3 score against 72.1. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is notably newer and extremely thinner than the Moto G4 Plus's, although it's also just a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a better screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a faster processing unit than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better battery duration than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 10 percent more battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much better video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.