Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 72.1. The LG V40 ThinQ design is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G4 Plus. LG V40 ThinQ has a better performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a larger display. The LG V40 ThinQ has a better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a way bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery performance than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a lot more money than Moto G4 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.