Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Moto G4 Plus, with a overall score of 87 against 72.1. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is a lot newer and extremely thinner than the Moto G4 Plus's, although it is somewhat heavier. Motorola razr (2020) has a screen that is very similar to the Motorola Moto G4 Plus one, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit worse resolution of 876 x 2142px and a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster CPU than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a larger aperture for better low-light images, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a much higher (4K) video resolution. Motorola Moto G4 Plus features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G4 Plus, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.