Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, with a general score of 83.8 against 72.1. The Galaxy A50 is a newer and thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, although it's just a bit heavier. Galaxy A50 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G4 Plus. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a larger screen and a bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A50 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Galaxy A50 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has superior battery duration than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A50 costs a lot more money than Moto G4 Plus, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.