Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, with an 85.5 score against 72.1. The Galaxy A51 design is extremely newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus's, but it is also just a little heavier. Galaxy A51 features a bit superior CPU than Moto G4 Plus. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a just a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a bigger display. The Galaxy A51 has much more storage to install games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A51 shoots way better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has a much better resolution camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A51 costs a lot more money than the Moto G4 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.