Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is way better than Moto G4 Plus's score of 72.1. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is way newer and thinner than Moto G4 Plus's, although it's also heavier. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little more vivid screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a larger screen, a just a little higher screen pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A51 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than Moto G4 Plus, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a greater camera than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a way more megapixels camera and a much better 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior battery life than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than the Moto G4 Plus, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.