Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-05-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Moto G4 Plus, but it's somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit sharper display than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bit greater pixels density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A52 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 50% greater battery size. Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.