Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than Moto G4 Plus, having a overall score of 76.9 against 72.1. The Galaxy A70 is a way newer and notably thinner device than the Moto G4 Plus, but it is somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A70 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A70 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Moto G4 Plus features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture, they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy A70 counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A70 has a much better battery life than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.