Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is way better than Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 general score. Even though Galaxy A71 is heavier than the Moto G4 Plus, it's notably thinner and incredibly newer. Galaxy A71 features a slightly better display than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A71 counts with a little better performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A71 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a greater camera than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has a really longer battery performance than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy A71 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy A71, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G4 Plus, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.