Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, having a 92.9 score against 72.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 50% greater battery size. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better photos and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments, a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a much better video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G4 Plus. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto G4 Plus, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.