Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-05-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, having a score of 85.2 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s design is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot better 24 MP resolution. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 27 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.