Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the Moto G4 Plus's global score of 72.1. The Galaxy Fold is a newer and extremely thinner device than the Moto G4 Plus, although it is also a lot heavier. The Galaxy Fold features a better performing processor than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a way larger display. Galaxy Fold has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior camera than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a much larger camera aperture for better low light photos. The Galaxy Fold has a very superior battery lifetime than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G4 Plus. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G4 Plus, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.