Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Moto G4 Plus, with a 90.8 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than Moto G4 Plus, but it is also way heavier. Galaxy Note 20 has a quite superior performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a quite worse pixels amount per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a much less MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher video quality. Galaxy Note 20 has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G4 Plus. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G4 Plus, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.