Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola Moto G4 Plus's overall score of 72.1. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, it's thinner and a lot newer. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater hardware performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a just a bit greater screen pixels density and a bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a way better video quality and a much higher resolution back camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G4 Plus, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.