Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, having a global score of 89 against 72.1. Galaxy Note10's body is extremely newer and much thinner than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus's, although it's just a little heavier. Galaxy Note10 counts with a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite larger display.
Galaxy Note10 features a superior processor than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note10 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note10 features just a bit better battery performance than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 captures better photographs and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.