Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a global score of 86.2, which is much better than Moto G4 Plus's global score of 72.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is noticeably heavier than the Moto G4 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and notably newer. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little bit better looking display than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note10 Lite takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.