Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is way better than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, having an 88.3 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy S10's construction is extremely newer and thinner than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus's, but it's also just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S10 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a higher pixels density, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has much more memory for games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a faster processing unit than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way larger aperture for better low light photography and video. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a bit better battery performance than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.