Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Moto G4 Plus, having a general score of 93.6 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a newer and notably thinner cellphone than Moto G4 Plus, but it is extremely heavier. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a better hardware performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a sharper screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a larger display and a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a superior camera than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a way bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.