Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is better than the Moto G4 Plus, having an 86.3 score against 72.1. The Galaxy S10e is a a lot newer phone, and it's also a lot thinner and a little lighter than Moto G4 Plus. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a superior processing power than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10e features a little bit better screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bit larger display, a little higher pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S10e counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit better battery performance than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G4 Plus. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G4 Plus, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.