Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than the Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 general score. Even though the Galaxy S20 is just a little bit heavier than the Moto G4 Plus, it's much thinner and extremely newer. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a more vivid screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a little bit larger display, a lot better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S20 features a quite superior processing power than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S20 counts with longer battery lifetime than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G4 Plus, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.