Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, getting a 90.8 score against 72.1. Galaxy S20 FE's design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus's, but it's also heavier. Galaxy S20 FE has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a larger screen, a little greater pixel amount in each inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a better CPU than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S20 FE features a better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S20 FE, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.