Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Moto G4 Plus, with a general score of 98 against 72.1. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G4 Plus, but it is noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better processor than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater amount of pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a way higher video definition, a bigger camera aperture for better images in low light situations and a camera in the back with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery life than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G4 Plus, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.