Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 98.1, which is much better than the Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 score. The Galaxy S21 Ultra design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto G4 Plus's, although it's notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a larger display, a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S21 Ultra has slightly more memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S21 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a way higher video definition. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G4 Plus, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.