Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than Moto G4 Plus, having a overall score of 93.4 against 72.1. Although the Galaxy S22 is just a little heavier than Moto G4 Plus, it's noticeably thinner and notably newer. The Samsung Galaxy S22 features just a bit better performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 features a much sharper display than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a quite higher screen pixels density, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S22 features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has superior battery lifetime than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 23% larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bigger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a lot higher video definition and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G4 Plus. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G4 Plus, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.