Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Moto G4 Plus, with a 95.4 score against 72.1. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is heavier than Moto G4 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and newer. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bigger display, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery duration than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G4 Plus. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G4 Plus, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.