Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S4 is a bit better than Moto G4 Plus, with a 76.1 score against 72.1. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S4 is extremely older than Moto G4 Plus, it's design is way thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a little faster processor than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S4 counts with a better screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Galaxy S4 also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S4 features a camera that is just as good as the Motorola Moto G4 Plus one, although the Galaxy S4 has a lower video quality, a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in poorly lited situations and a camera with a lower 13 MP resolution.
Moto G4 Plus has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola Moto G4 Plus features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 is a bit more expensive than Moto G4 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.