Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 5.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport construction is somewhat thinner than Moto G4 Plus, although it is just a little heavier and was released about 23 months before. Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better processing unit than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU.
Galaxy S5 Sport has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a little higher display pixel density. Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a camera with a 16 mega pixels, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a way higher video resolution.
The Motorola Moto G4 Plus has a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 128 GB, the Motorola Moto G4 Plus also has more internal memory capacity. The Moto G4 Plus features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G4 Plus, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.