Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, getting an 88.5 score against 72.1. Galaxy Z Flip's body is much newer and way thinner than Motorola Moto G4 Plus's, but it is somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a larger display and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a quite better processing power than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and a way better video quality. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G4 Plus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G4 Plus, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.