Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is noticeably newer and extremely thinner than the Moto G4 Plus's, although it's also somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a bigger display, a little greater pixel count in each display inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G4 Plus, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.