Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than the Moto G4 Plus's 72.1 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is much newer and a lot thinner, but a lot heavier than the Moto G4 Plus. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better looking display than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a really bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior processor than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light photos. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto G4 Plus, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.