Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Moto G4 Plus, having a global score of 81.1 against 72.1. Even though the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way heavier than Moto G4 Plus, it's somewhat thinner and much newer. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better display than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little bit lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a larger aperture, a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.