Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-28 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the Moto G41's 79.1 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50 is notably older than Moto G41, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A50 and Moto G41 count with really similar displays, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a quite inferior pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a same size display.
The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G41. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Moto G41 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G41 also has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto G41 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G41 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G41 features improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.