Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Moto G41, getting a global score of 91.3 against 79.1. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a little heavier phone than the Moto G41, but they are 0.33inches thick. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Moto G41 has Android 11, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better processing power than Moto G41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G has a display that is just as good as Moto G41's display, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior camera than Moto G41, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's storage to install applications and games is just as good as Moto G41's one, both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
Moto G41 features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.